Because we’re in a strong legal position, I’ve decided to stay focused on my current schedule and let the “based on a true story, fictionalized” pieces (below and forthcoming) speak for themselves. I’m not interested in being tied to anyone previously mentioned, and I’m moving forward.
As a note to those who’ve tried to attach themselves to us during this time, please don’t. I’m not trying to be unkind — I simply don’t need or want new connections tied to anyone involved. I’m my own person, and I’m learning to be more careful about who I let close. Yesterday I was reminded, at length, that being too open has made my family vulnerable. It’s a sad realization, but it’s also where I am because of what’s happened.
I’m not suggesting I’m anyone special — but being online, being in creative spaces, and being part of so many groups over the years has taught me that visibility comes with risks. My family has reminded me to be more careful, and I’m taking that to heart.
So for now, I’m keeping my circle small and focusing on creating something meaningful — something that might even tie everything together in the end.
On a brighter note, my recently completed song is being considered for sync placement. I’ve danced around the house all morning. I never imagined this particular song, written to support the book and documentary about my youngest brother (who passed away in 2018), would take on a life of its own. Life has done a one‑eighty and then another, and now I’m returning to what I love most: writing.
To those involved with the London‑based film, I wish you well. I’m not involved, and whatever they choose to do doesn’t affect me or my family.
For now, I’m writing fiction (wink) and focusing on the good things in life. I love my readers, and I’m grateful for the thousands who’ve supported me long before I felt like I deserved it. If I make new friends, they’ll be the ones who find me through my co‑writing and book clubs — because those are the people who tend to understand me best. And to my readers who have been with me for many years, you’ll always live in my heart and mind, because without you, I might have stayed in the shadows many years ago. Instead, I stepped into the film industry and discovered that I can do anything.
XoXO
A Simple Story That Documents a Very Real Truth
LAW OFFICES OF HEMLOCK & BRINE Advocates for the Unjustly Accused Briar’s Edge, North Territory
To: Hope Jones & Kindred Jones From: Rowan Brine, Esq. Re: Conduct of Pretenza and Cravella Fairweather
Dear Ms. Jones and Mr. Jones,
Some cases arrive on my desk quietly. Others arrive with a thud. Yours arrived with a crash, a clang, and the unmistakable sound of two Fairweathers shrieking into the void of the internet.
After reviewing the materials you provided — including their very own altered arbitration filing against another party (with no relation to you or your family), the threats directed at you and/or your family, the defamatory posts, and the seventy‑two‑hour digital siege Hope endured — I am writing to outline the civil and criminal categories that may be relevant in situations like this, as well as the broader pattern of conduct exhibited by Pretenza and Cravella Fairweather.
This letter is written in the spirit of clarity, seriousness, and, where appropriate, the kind of humor one must employ when dealing with individuals who behave like villains from a low‑budget soap opera.
I. SUMMARY OF EVENTS
Hope Jones left the production associated with filmmaker Declan Perlmour in August. She left because the Fairweathers — Cravella and her daughter Pretenza — had inserted themselves into the creative process with the finesse of two goats attempting ballet on a jogger’s trampoline.
Within hours of Hope’s departure, she was subjected to seventy‑two hours of continuous online harassment. The intensity of this harassment was such that Hope later told me (this past November) that she was shocked she was “permitted” to leave unscathed.
That word — permitted — is a testament to the psychological pressure she endured. No one should ever feel they require permission to exit a workplace or creative environment.
Meanwhile, Pretenza Fairweather posted on her website what appeared to be a legitimate arbitration filing connected to her dispute with Mr. Perlmour. However, the document had been altered. In the altered version, she inserted the name of Kindred Jones — a man who has never met her, never worked with her, and has no connection to the film industry — and attached several old, resolved, or irrelevant cases. The effect was to create the false impression that Mr. Jones was involved in an international dispute or criminal matter.
This was not a mistake. It was a calculated act of reputational sabotage.
Cravella Fairweather, meanwhile, directed multiple threats toward Hope Jones, including a statement that she would “put you to sleep.” She also made defamatory statements about both Hope and Kindred, encouraged harassment, and has a documented pattern of making online threats toward young women and their families.
With this context established, I will now outline the civil and criminal categories that may be relevant in situations like this.
II. CIVIL CATEGORIES RELEVANT TO KINDRED JONES and what he can file against the relevant parties.
Defamation (Libel) — False statements published online that harm reputation.
False Light — Misleading portrayal of an individual in a damaging manner.
Harassment (TCA § 39‑17‑308 – general category) — Repeated unwanted conduct causing distress.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress — Outrageous conduct causing severe emotional harm.
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress — Reckless disregard for emotional well‑being.
Digital Defamation / Online Harassment — False statements published on websites or social platforms.
Reputational Harm / Loss of Income — Damages arising from false allegations.
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
III. CRIMINAL CATEGORIES POTENTIALLY IMPLICATED BY PRETENZA FAIRWEATHER’S CONDUCT and how they pertain to you (and how you should file your claims against Pretenza)
False Information / Hoaxes (18 U.S.C. § 1038)
Interstate Harassment / Cyberstalking (18 U.S.C. § 2261A)
Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)
Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371)
False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
Criminal Impersonation (TCA § 39‑16‑301)
Harassment (TCA § 39‑17‑308)
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
IV. CIVIL CATEGORIES RELEVANT TO HOPE JONES (and what she should file against the parties that attacked her)
Defamation (Libel)
False Light
Harassment (TCA § 39‑17‑308)
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
Digital Defamation / Online Harassment
Loss of Income / Reputational Harm
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
V. CRIMINAL CATEGORIES POTENTIALLY IMPLICATED BY CRAVELLA FAIRWEATHER’S CONDUCT against "HOPE" Jones.
Interstate Threats / Extortion (18 U.S.C. § 875)
Interstate Harassment / Cyberstalking (18 U.S.C. § 2261A)
Harassment (TCA § 39‑17‑308)
Stalking (TCA § 39‑17‑315)
Criminal Intimidation
False Information / Hoaxes (18 U.S.C. § 1038)
Defamation‑related conduct
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
VI. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS: ABUSE OF A DISABLED INDIVIDUAL and how these two women harmed "Hope" Jones
It is widely recognized that Hope Jones is considered a disabled individual due to a 2024 assault. The Fairweathers were aware of this status. In situations involving harassment or threats directed at a disabled person, the following categories may be relevant:
Harassment of a Vulnerable Individual
Exploitation or Intimidation of a Disabled Person
Enhanced Penalties for Threats Against a Protected Individual
Abuse or Neglect of a Vulnerable Adult
Disability‑Based Harassment
Aggravated Emotional Distress
Civil Damages for Targeting a Disabled Person
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
VII. ONE‑PARTY CONSENT: RECORDING CALLS IN TN & NY--Just for your records.
Tennessee and New York are both one‑party consent states. When each participant is located in a one‑party consent state, recording a call is lawful as long as one participant consents. While both parties were in Tennessee when these accusations were made, it doesn't matter if they were or were not, given the law and what actually transpired.
VIII. FEDERAL CATEGORIES (GENERAL LEGAL INFORMATION)
18 U.S.C. § 1038 – False Information / Hoaxes 18 U.S.C. § 912 – Impersonating Federal Authority 18 U.S.C. § 1001 – False Statements 18 U.S.C. § 2261A – Interstate Harassment / Cyberstalking 18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy 18 U.S.C. § 875 – Interstate Threats / Extortion
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
IX. TENNESSEE CATEGORIES (GENERAL LEGAL INFORMATION)
TCA § 39‑17‑308 – Harassment TCA § 39‑17‑315 – Stalking TCA § 39‑16‑301 – Criminal Impersonation TCA § 39‑17‑309 – Threats Defamation (common law) False Light Emotional Distress (civil tort)
These are the top filings recommended for this particular action, but we have many more to discuss.
X. DAMAGES AND NEXT STEPS
The sooner we file these, the sooner you and your family can heal. It is important that we establish the approximate date when this conduct began. My staff and I will continue monitoring the Fairweather website so that we can assign a dollar amount to the damages you and your individual family members have suffered.
With your sister’s and nephew’s SEO background, we have confirmed that you, your brothers, sister, and nephew are the targets of this outlandish pursuit and would like to represent you all in matters against the Fairweathers (as individuals) and the other appropriate entity. We have the contact information for the Fairweathers through their appropriate representatives.
Your sisters are disabled individuals, but given the blood disorders your entire family has suffered, please advise if you are also disabled so we may file the appropriate actions for you as well. While you’ve indicated that the Fairweathers themselves may not be able to pay any award should they be found liable, others involved may be in a different lane. Garnishments would also be in effect so that their future compensation reflects the pain and suffering you and your family have endured.
Let us cross one bridge at a time. In the meantime, I’m honored to represent you and very sorry that you and your family have fallen victim to these people. While it won’t bring assurances, know that they have subjected themselves to a legal war by attaching you and your family to another case, which demolishes their credibility in this case and any other.
No comments:
Post a Comment